A quick, honest guide for players who know their Playtomic level and want to understand where they sit on OPR.
OPR runs on its own scale — built for doubles, and finer-grained than Playtomic's 0–7.
As a rough guide, an OPR level sits about 5.5 to 6 points above the equivalent Playtomic level:
It's a guide, not a strict formula — and that's deliberate. No two rating systems convert exactly (even Playtomic says its level doesn't convert cleanly to other systems). Giving a range is the honest, accurate way to do it.
Here are three real players across both systems:
| Player | OPR level | Playtomic |
|---|---|---|
| Player A | 9.6 | 4.0 |
| Player B | 9.7 | 3.45 |
| Player C | 7.9 | 2.0 |
Look at A and B. OPR has them almost level — 9.6 and 9.7. Playtomic has them half a point apart, in the opposite order. They can't both be right — and the reason matters.
OPR has watched A and B play a full body of matches at the club, so it knows they're the same standard. The Playtomic figures come from only a handful of logged rounds — and Playtomic itself says a level isn't reliable until a player has played ~15–20 matches. So the gap wanders not because OPR is uncertain, but because the Playtomic numbers are still settling.
"Great — roughly, take about 5.5 off an OPR level and you're in Playtomic territory, so a 9.6 is around a Playtomic 4. But OPR's a sharper instrument: it can tell two similar players apart that a broad global scale, on limited rounds, gets in the wrong order — because OPR is reading your actual club history."