Levels Explained

OPR & Playtomic — how they compare

A quick, honest guide for players who know their Playtomic level and want to understand where they sit on OPR.

The quick answer

The rough conversion

OPR runs on its own scale — built for doubles, and finer-grained than Playtomic's 0–7.

As a rough guide, an OPR level sits about 5.5 to 6 points above the equivalent Playtomic level:

OPR level ≈ Playtomic + 5.5
So an OPR 9.6 is around a Playtomic 4.

It's a guide, not a strict formula — and that's deliberate. No two rating systems convert exactly (even Playtomic says its level doesn't convert cleanly to other systems). Giving a range is the honest, accurate way to do it.

Why it's a guide, not a formula

What the numbers show

Here are three real players across both systems:

PlayerOPR levelPlaytomic
Player A9.64.0
Player B9.73.45
Player C7.92.0

Look at A and B. OPR has them almost level — 9.6 and 9.7. Playtomic has them half a point apart, in the opposite order. They can't both be right — and the reason matters.

OPR has watched A and B play a full body of matches at the club, so it knows they're the same standard. The Playtomic figures come from only a handful of logged rounds — and Playtomic itself says a level isn't reliable until a player has played ~15–20 matches. So the gap wanders not because OPR is uncertain, but because the Playtomic numbers are still settling.

Why OPR is the truer read at your club

Built on your real history

How to put it

The friendly one-liner

When someone says "but we use Playtomic"

"Great — roughly, take about 5.5 off an OPR level and you're in Playtomic territory, so a 9.6 is around a Playtomic 4. But OPR's a sharper instrument: it can tell two similar players apart that a broad global scale, on limited rounds, gets in the wrong order — because OPR is reading your actual club history."